![]() Then you can fill in the name and football and have a great looking desgin. In Sierra if you simplify the design, it will only put stones on the shield where they need to be and curve around the name and ball. A great example in Sierra is let's say you have some type of shield as your background, then you have a name and a football stacked on top. ![]() The only thing is you definitely need to start with good artwork (of course they are all like that). in no time flat with very little editing needed. But for me, Sierra has the best radial fill options and output. ![]() GemMaster is nice when you just want to be able to easily trace a design that maybe you don't have a good vector image of or is too detailed to have automatically traced. It does a great job on more grid type fills. DAS has some great features and is easy to work with but lack good radial fills. I do not use WinSign at all (but I have not taken the time to really work with it much). I also have DAS Smart Cut Pro, WinSignPC 2010, and GemMaster. But I was told they are working on a fix for it. The rhinestone module is still fairly new and there are some things that are a little more time consuming, but that's because at this point you can only choose one stone at a time to edit instead of a group of stones. I have the Sierrra software for the Cams machine and I love it as far as the ease of doing fills.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2023
Categories |